文章来源：http://www.motortrend.com/news/2015-honda-cr-v-touring-awd-review-update-6/
原文：
Pick One: Improved Efficiency or Quicker Acceleration?
We hate to break it to you, but CR-V doesnotstand for Constantly Racing Vehicle. Although the long-term2015 Honda CR-V is no sports car, it continues to perform well after months behind the wheel. Because after you stop fiddling with the infotainment system of that new car in the showroom, the actual driving experience still matters a great deal.
翻译：
鱼与熊掌不可兼得，更高效率还是更快的加速？
不得不说，本田的CR-V不是一辆用于疯狂赛车的车辆。尽管本次关于2015款本田CR-V的长测不注重运动性能，几个月来驾驶这台车的感受也是非常优秀的。因为除了在展厅摆弄新车的那套娱乐系统，真正的驾驶感受仍然是最重要的。
原文：
Even with the high-end Touring model’s upsized 18-inch wheels, the CR-V rides well. The crossover isolates you from some but not all road imperfections, as you’d expect from a vehicle that’s completely loaded around $34,000 including destination. Body roll is kept in check, and communicative steering is a plus. The CR-V never feels as small as a Fit or as big as a Pilot, but it always performs competently, whether in the city or traveling on winding roads.
翻译：
即使是用上了高配旅行版的大到18寸的轮毂，这台CR-V依旧非常舒适。他非常有效的吸收了路面的颠簸。正如你所能期待的一台差不多3400美元的车能带给你的体验。车身控制的非常好，操控非常流畅。这辆CR-V尺寸介于飞度和Pilot（译者注：一款没有在国内上市的本田SUV）之间，但是他依旧表现的非常有竞争力。不论是在城市道路还是在弯曲的山路。
原文：
Sure, I’d enjoy the CR-V more if it were quicker, but our all-wheel-drive long-termer’s 8.9-second 0-60-mph time is in line with a couple other high-volume AWD competitors we’ve tested, including a 2013 Toyota RAV4 at 8.7 seconds and a 2014 Nissan Rogue at 9.1 seconds. Even considering how slow our CR-V becomes in Econ mode—in a previous update we discovered that 0-60 takes a Motor Trend-tested 9.7 seconds—I’d rather have Honda continue to improve efficiency. As long as the fuel tank is of a decent size, a more efficient daily driver visits the gas station less frequently and doesn’t cost quite as much to maintain. Tell us what you think: Would you find more appealing a quicker CR-V or a more efficient CR-V? Considering the new 2016 Civic manages to do both simultaneously, maybe we’ll see improvements for both on the next-gen CR-V.
翻译：
没错，如果他能更快点，我会更喜欢这辆CR-V。他的0-60英里的加速的加速成绩是8.9秒，这个成绩表现平平，与其他我们测试过的身材差不多的四驱竞争者是差不多的。包括2013款的丰田RAV4是8.7秒，2014款的日产Rogue（译者注：国内奇骏）是9.1秒。在上一期的测评中，CR-V的0-60英里的加速成绩是9.7秒，这个是在经济模式下的成绩。我们还是宁愿本田继续去提高这款车的发动机效率。只要油箱的尺寸合适，一些更看中效率的用于日常通勤的车主来说，就是少跑几趟加油站，少花一些养护的费用。说说你会怎么想？你喜欢一个更快的CR-V呢？还是一个更高效的CR-V？不过，下一代的2016款本田思域打算同时兼顾效率和加速。这让我们不得不好好的期待一下，下一代的CR-V。
原文：
Interestingly, the 2016-model-year CR-V sees cuts in EPA-rated fuel economy. The 2016 CR-V adds a new SE trim above the LX trim but is otherwise unchanged, yet from 2015 to 2016, fuel economy drops from 27/34 mpg city/highway to 26/33 mpg with front-wheel drive and from 26/33 mpg to 25/31 mpg with all-wheel drive. That’s a drop of about 4 and 6 percent for AWD models in the city and on the highway and about 4 and 3 percent for FWD models in the city and on the highway, respectively. None is an especially significant difference, but they’re moving in the wrong direction. Why? A few changes have been made to the 2016 CR-V to address the vibration issue that a few 2015 CR-V owners reported. Even so, the 2016 CR-V’s combined city/highway EPA ratings for an AWD model still beat those of theChevrolet Equinox(23 mpg),Mazda CX-5(26 mpg),Toyota RAV4(25 mpg), andFord Escape1.6 EcoBoost (25 mpg), tie theSubaru Forester2.5i, and fall short by 1 mpg to theNissan Rogue. In Real MPG testing, our AWD 2015 CR-V hit 23.0/28.8 mpg compared to an AWD 2015 Rogue’s 22.6/28.9 mpg.
翻译：
有趣的是，2016年款的CR-V被美国环保署下调了燃油经济性的排名。2016款的CR-V在LX款的基础上增加了一个SE款，但是好像没起什么作用。前驱模式下从2015年到2016年期间燃油经济性从城市道路27英里每加仑下滑到26英里每加仑，高速34英里每加仑下滑到33英里每加仑。四驱模式下，城市道路26英里每加仑下滑到25英里每加仑，高速33英里每加仑下滑到31英里每加仑。四驱模式下，这差不多下滑了4个百分点在城市道路上，高速上达到了6个百分点。前驱模式下，城市道路差不多下滑4个百分点，高速道路下滑了3个百分点。分别来看，尽管每一项都不是差别很大。但是，我认为他们走向了一条错误的道路。为什么这么说呢？2016款CR-V做了一些关于车辆震动的优化，因为他们从2015款CR-V车主那收到了一些有关这个的抱怨。尽管如此，2016款的CR-V的综合油耗（结合力城市和高速）在美国环境署的排名还是要优于雪佛兰Equinox（译者注：国内科帕奇）的23英里每加仑，马自达CX-5的26英里每加仑，丰田RAV4的25英里每加仑，以及福特Escape（译者注：国内翼虎）1.6经济型的25英里每加仑，追平了斯巴鲁森林人2.5i，仅仅输给日产Rogue（译者注：国内奇骏）了1英里每加仑。在实测中，我们的这台2015款四驱CR-V达到了城市道路23英里每加仑以及高速道路28.8英里每加仑，与2015款日产Rogue（译者注：国内奇骏）的城市道路22.6英里每加仑，高速道路28.9英里每加仑基本持平。
原文：
As noted in the first update, a small number of CR-V owners have reported experiencing a vibration through the driver’s seat. For our long-term CR-V, the vibration only occurs at idle and is subtle and intermittent. Product improvements weren’t ready at our last service, but they became available in late in 2015—we’ll get the CR-V at our next service and hope to test how the crossover’s fuel economy might be affected. Honda notes that the vibration has no effect on reliability.
翻译：
正如我们在第一期测评中指出的，少部分的CR-V车主曾反应他们感受到了来自驾驶座的震动。在我们的这次长测中，这个震动仅仅偶尔出现在怠速时，而且也是非常轻微。在我们上次保养的时候，产品的改进方案还没有好，但是在2015年末已经出台了。所以下次保养的时候，我们要试试看消除震动的这个改进是怎么影响油耗的。在此必须要提醒本田注意，这个小小的震动，根本不影响车辆的可靠性。
原文：
I’m happy with how the CR-V actually drives overall, but like most vehicles in this class, it could be a little quicker or more efficient. Still, despite the CR-V only offering active safety tech on the top trim level, it presents a compelling argument for Accord buyers who are willing to sacrifice a tad in acceleration and efficiency for a versatile and spacious crossover.
In a future update, I’ll discuss one of the more controversial aspects of modern Hondas: the lack of a volume knob.
翻译：
我对于这台CR-V的总体驾驶感受比较满意，但是就像很多同级别的车一样，他应该拥有更好的加速性能或者更高的效率。不过，尽管这台CR-V仅仅在顶配车型上配备了主动安全技术。它仍很好的说服了那些为了更大的空间或者更多功能愿意牺牲一点点加速性或者是效率的车主。
在下次的更新中，我们会讨论一个最近本田做的非常有争议的改变，取消了音量旋钮。
