【学号】I15煎鸡蛋
【前言】
常言道：“温故而知新”。那么趁写作计划进行到一半时候，开始对之前写的东西进行“翻新”吧！
【文章】
Considering growing tensions of inequitable social phenomena emerging especially among city dwellers and rural ones, the government is currently sparing no effort to exert hukou reform, thus replace the old one. The new hukou system now implemented in thirty municipalities, province and automotive regions, aims to better distribute social welfare and better meet public interest. However, critics and suspicions appear when a range of problems seem to dissatisfied the public.
For a long time, the rural and the urban hukou system in China faces strong criticism for its unequal public services, like education, medical and health care, employment, social security, housing, land and demographic system. This obsolete mechanism will make it harder to protect the rural residents' rights and interests, if not treated appropriately. Nevertheless, the recently unified hukou system launched in several cities and regions shows that the new one cannot be perfect idealfor settling down some crucial problems. Migrants are not capable of having any labor or tendency contract, because most of them are casual laborers, which means migrants essentially fail to enjoy authentic benefits the government designed for them.
Even though the newly-planned policy does not guarantee perfect reformatory result, failure to implement it virtually guarantee an undesired result.There is no doubt that hukou reform havehas hereto benefited lots of people. With conspicuous conflicts are still damaging the public rights, we should therefore work jointly to safeguard them.
on the chinese hukou system
These days, the Chinese government is overhauling its hukou system nationwide to address inequalities between rural and urban residents in terms of public such as pensions,educationand health care services. However, this policy has some stringent requirements of either the legitimacy of a person s job and residence or a minimum span of urban residency ranging from 3 to 5 years.
Like an internal passport, hukou, a brown-colored booklet dictating a person's birthplace, current residence, and marital status, seems as sacred as the Bible to Chinese nationals. A decades-old leftover from the 1050s' national policy, the hukou system has long been scolded for its unequal nature--unequal to domestic servants including so many migrant workers who leave their fields to provide sweat and blood for the rapid growth of modern skylines of the cities, the high-speed trains, subways and road networks linking our vast country. Sadly though, despite the toil and travail they contribute to China's booming economy these people, the backbone of our country, have not enjoyed the same benefits in health care, pensions and other social welfare as city residents owing to the draconian hukou system in the old days. To the estimated 274 million migrant workers(2014)and college students who have landed jobs in cities, this man-made barrier blocks their dreams like a piece of barricade, thus branding a scar of inequality on the hearts of millions of contributors who aspire to live the same life as their urban peers.
Thanks to the new hukou policy which is aimed at phasing out restrictions in cities and setting reasonable conditions for people to settle in big cities, all Chinese nationals, no matterwhere they are born, will be gradually entitled to the same and equal treatment. To remove the barrier between the rural and the urban areas is a bold yet wise decision. It not only sweeps inequality but also unleashes domestic consumer demand. But the worries of crippling city infrastructures and security and destroying the countryside economy due to the rush of people into cities must be taken into serious consideration too.
【范文】
These days, the Chinese government is overhauling its hukou system nationwide to address inequalities between rural and urban residents in terms of public such as pensions,educationand health care services. However, this policy has some stringent requirements of either the legitimacy of a person s job and residence or a minimum span of urban residency ranging from 3 to 5 years.
【行文分析】
“点明中国正在改革户籍制度，以解决城乡居民之间的不平等问题。然后指出在许多大城市新的户籍制度对落户人员有严格的条件限制,不仅要求落户人员有正当的工作和稳定的住所,还要求其在所工作的城市居住3~5年。”
Like an internal passport, hukou, a brown-colored booklet dictating a person's birthplace, current residence, and marital status, seems as sacred as the Bible to Chinese nationals. A decades-old leftover from the 1050s' national policy, the hukou system has long been scolded for its unequal nature--unequal to domestic servants including so many migrant workers who leave their fields to provide sweat and blood for the rapid growth of modern skylines of the cities, the high-speed trains, subways and road networks linking our vast country. Sadly though, despite the toil and travail they contribute to China's booming economy these people, the backbone of our country, have not enjoyed the same benefits in health care, pensions and other social welfare as city residents owing to the draconian hukou system in the old days. To the estimated 274 million migrant workers(2014)and college students who have landed jobs in cities, this man-made barrier blocks their dreams like a piece of barricade, thus branding a scar of inequality on the hearts of millions of contributors who aspire to live the same life as their urban peers.
【行文分析】
“首先对户口进行了明确的定义,使用了类比说明户口类似国家的内部通行证。然后梳理户口的历史,指出曾经合理的户口制度现在饱受诟病,并一针见血地指明它制造了人与人之间的不公。然后用排比法提到那些没有城市户口却仍然为城市的发展做出巨大贡献的农民们和异地就业的大学毕业生。接着进一步指出,这些贡献者却因为僵化的户籍制度被挡在享受社会福利的门外,从而凸显户籍制度改革的迫切性。结尾部分首先歌颂了新的户口政策,并肯定了它为排除社会不公所做的贡献。接着指出新户籍制度在刺激城市经济消费方面也益处多多。最后还提到应及早重视极有可能因户籍改革而导致的城市人口激增引起的问题。”
Thanks to the new hukou policy which is aimed at phasing out restrictions in cities and setting reasonable conditions for people to settle in big cities, all Chinese nationals, no matterwhere they are born, will be gradually entitled to the same and equal treatment. To remove the barrier between the rural and the urban areas is a bold yet wise decision. It not only sweeps inequality but also unleashes domestic consumer demand. But the worries of crippling city infrastructures and security and destroying the countryside economy due to the rush of people into cities must be taken into serious consideration too.
